The Lawxy Times

Author Image
Lawxy Times Reporter

SEBI authorises REITs and InvITs to invest in third‑party projects

On 22 Oct 2026 the Securities and Exchange Board of India issued a proposal permitting Real Estate Investment Trusts and Infrastructure Investment Trusts to allocate capital to projects that are not originated by the sponsor, subject to SEBI‑prescribed conditions. The proposal expands the definition of permissible assets under the SEBI (Real Estate Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014 and the SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014. Sponsors, trustees and existing unit‑holders are immediately impacted, as they must now seek regulatory clearance before making any third‑party investment. The move also delineates the compliance framework that will govern such allocations.

Full News Breakdown

The regulator’s initiative was prompted by industry feedback that sponsor‑sourced pipelines are insufficient to sustain the growth of REITs and InvITs. SEBI responded by announcing a structured pathway for external project investment, contingent on meeting a set of eligibility and disclosure criteria.

  • Date: 22 Oct 2026

  • Statutes Cited: SEBI (Real Estate Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014; SEBI (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) Regulations, 2014

  • Key Provisions: Sections 13(1) and 14(2) of the REIT Regulations; Sections 12(1) and 15(3) of the InvIT Regulations (proposed amendment language)

  • Primary Legal Issue: Whether REITs and InvITs may invest in assets that are not transferred from the sponsor’s own portfolio.

  • Operative Order: SEBI proposes to allow such investments after prior approval and compliance with prescribed conditions.

  • Practical Outcome: Trusts will be able to diversify beyond sponsor‑originated assets, provided they obtain the requisite clearance and amend their trust deeds accordingly.

How Does This Affect You?

Previously, the regulatory framework left sponsors uncertain about the permissibility of allocating funds to external projects, creating a de‑facto restriction on portfolio diversification. The proposal resolves that uncertainty by expressly authorising third‑party investments once SEBI‑approved conditions are satisfied. In practice, trusts can now pursue a broader set of assets, but they must incorporate new compliance steps, amendment procedures and disclosure obligations into their operating models.

For Lawyers & Advocates

  • Amend the trust deed of each REIT to insert a clause authorising third‑party investments and to specify the SEBI‑approved conditions that must be satisfied before any allocation.

  • Revise InvIT investment‑policy documents to reflect the expanded asset class, ensuring that the revised policy is filed with SEBI within the stipulated 30‑day window after amendment.

  • Prepare a detailed investment‑proposal memorandum for each prospective third‑party project, including eligibility check‑lists, risk‑assessment matrices and a compliance‑certification statement, to satisfy SEBI’s pre‑approval requirement.

  • Advise ongoing REIT/InvIT transactions to incorporate a “conditional‑approval” clause that allows the trustee to defer execution until SEBI clearance is received, thereby mitigating the risk of post‑closing regulatory breach.

  • Develop a precedent‑based argument that SEBI’s amendment power under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, does not require a legislative amendment, using BSE Ltd. v. SEBI (2015) as supporting authority, to defend future challenges to the regulator’s scope.

For Law Students

This case illustrates the extent of a regulator’s delegated authority to modify the substantive content of collective‑investment schemes without parliamentary enactment. The core doctrine concerns the interpretation of statutory empowerment clauses versus the need for legislative amendment.

The decision is particularly relevant for the study of:

  • Statutory interpretation of the SEBI Act’s “regulatory powers” provision.

  • The doctrine of implied powers in securities regulation.

  • Comparative analysis of collective‑investment scheme governance under Indian law.

  • The impact of regulatory amendments on fiduciary duties of trustees.

Comparable cases include SEBI v. Sahara India Pariwar (2012) SC, which delineates SEBI’s supervisory reach, and BSE Ltd. v. SEBI (2015) Delhi HC, which confirms the board’s ability to alter scheme parameters without a new statute. Contrasting these judgments with the present proposal clarifies how courts balance regulatory flexibility against the principle of legislative supremacy.

For Businesses

  • REIT sponsors must convene an extraordinary board meeting to approve the trust‑deed amendment and to file the revised deed with SEBI; failure to do so will preclude any third‑party allocation and may trigger penalty provisions.

  • InvIT sponsors need to update their project‑selection framework, embed the new eligibility checklist into internal approval workflows, and ensure that the compliance team obtains SEBI’s written consent before committing capital.

  • Domestic insurance companies should revise their investment‑policy statements to reflect the newly permissible exposure to REIT/InvIT third‑party assets, lest they breach solvency‑margin calculations under IRDAI guidelines.

  • Pension fund managers must recalibrate asset‑allocation models to incorporate the potential yield uplift from external projects, and must document the change in the fund’s investment‑policy memorandum to satisfy audit requirements.

Key Takeaways

  • SEBI now expressly permits REITs and InvITs to invest in projects that are not transferred from the sponsor’s own portfolio, subject to regulatory approval.

  • Trustees must amend trust deeds, obtain SEBI clearance and embed new compliance checks before executing any third‑party investment.

  • SEBI gains enforcement authority to penalise unauthorised allocations, including monetary fines and suspension of the trust’s registration.

  • Watch for the detailed SEBI guidelines expected in Q1 2027, which will spell out eligibility criteria, disclosure formats and timelines for approval.

  • CFOs and general counsel should initiate deed‑amendment drafts and compliance‑process redesigns before the 31 Dec 2026 deadline for filing the proposed changes.

Source: SEBI exploring proposal to allow REITs, InvITs to invest in third-party projects: ED Maninder Cheema

Secure by design. Built for enterprise.

More About Security

Lawxy AI is designed with encrypted infrastructure, access controls, audit visibility, and enterprise-grade security standards.

SOC 2 Type I, II

GDPR

ISO 27001

VAPT Tested

See Legal Intelligence in Action?

LAWXY

Legal Intelligence Layer Businesses Rely On

Copyright© 2026 Lawxy AI. All Rights Reserved.

Secure by design. Built for enterprise.

More About Security

Lawxy AI is designed with encrypted infrastructure, access controls, audit visibility, and enterprise-grade security standards.

SOC 2 Type I, II

GDPR

ISO 27001

VAPT Tested

See Legal Intelligence in Action?

LAWXY

Legal Intelligence Layer Businesses Rely On

Copyright© 2026 Lawxy AI. All Rights Reserved.

Secure by design. Built for enterprise.

More About Security

Lawxy AI is designed with encrypted infrastructure, access controls, audit visibility, and enterprise-grade security standards.

SOC 2 Type I, II

GDPR

ISO 27001

VAPT Tested

See Legal Intelligence in Action?

LAWXY

Legal Intelligence Layer Businesses Rely On

Copyright© 2026 Lawxy AI. All Rights Reserved.